Great turn of the TAR appeal against the new incinerator Selvapiana. There are many grounds on which the Tar gives us reason. Just to name a few (but the details will communicate them to you after reading the details of the above): the question of landscape with the opinion of the Superintendent which was considered ambiguous because "move towards" the ambiguity about the type and quantity of waste that has not been specified , and more.
Then enter the ruling on the merits, in substance, not just about "vices formal "as has been reported in the province. Thanks to all those who worked and supported the positions of the Association Valdisieve, the team of lawyers who did a great job for our Italy that has allowed us to bring the motivation Association before the TAR, as then it happened, we felt that we were born "ad hoc" for this problem, and therefore did not accept our application only as a problem, "time" and not in the content (that I remember are the same as for other applicants).
AND NOW MUST GO ON TO DO TO AVOID THE OLD BUILDING AND PROPOSING TO CLOSE ALL POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT IS NOT INTENDED ONLY TO INTEREST BUT TAKE SERIOUS CONSIDERATION source reduction, reuse, recycling, curbside collection SELECTIVE WITH TIMELY RATES (so that those who pollute more pay more), select additional indifferentiation THAT REMAINS FINALLY THE DUMP ( which is also needed if you use incinerators because they are more than 30% of hazardous-waste!! In this regard we invite you to give a 'look at this chart that shows how the 13 municipalities that are parties to send him aer fewer tons of landfill material by the incinerator!).
0 comments:
Post a Comment